"Climate Activist Got BBC to Change 'Global Temperatures Decrease' Article NewsBusters has just learned that a British "climate activist" was responsible for getting the BBC to radically alter its "Global Temperatures 'To Decrease'" article last Friday." more at newsbusters.org. |
|||
 |
Campaign against Climate ChangeUK activists portal |
|
|
|
Whoa Nelly!!!!!!!!
"from Jo Abbess
to Roger Harrabin ,
date Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM
subject Re: Correction Demanded : "Global temperatures 'to decrease'"
This is not an issue of "debate". This is an issue
of emerging truth.
Otherwise, I would have to conclude that you are insufficiently
educated to be able to know when you have been psychologically
manipulated. And that would make you an unreliable reporter.
I am about to send your comments to others for their contribution,
unless you request I do not. They are likely to want to post your
comments on forums/fora, so please indicate if you do not want this to
happen. You may appear in an unfavourable light because it could be
said that you have had your head turned by the sceptics.
Respectfully,
jo. "
-----------------------------
Are you sure Jo Abbess hasn't worked for the Nazi Propaganda Machine? Hmmmm???
Trying to sustain the "war" with semantics?
Reminds me of former President Clinton and his definition and defense(?) of the word "is" during his impeachment hearings.... ah, if the truth presents itself, then beat it down with semantics. Debate vs. Emerging Truth, ah interesting.
The very blatant threat to this reporter's well being (professionally, emotionally and psychologically) with the quote from her email response would make Goebbels proud!!!
I think the quoted "to be able to know when you have been psychologically
manipulated" applies to the pressure of Jo Abbess' email response against the reporter. Plus the threat of worldwide public humiliation "respectfully" done.
And to get the article changed in less than one and one half hours no less!
Heil Abbess!!!!!!
Those darn sceptics
Just a thought. Since when did it become a bad thing to be skeptical? Skepticism has it's roots in Greek education and helps safeguard people from propaganda, which many people would claim is the driving force behind global warming, by the way. Maybe those of you touting global warming as the "new religion" should take a step back and ask, "whose heads are really being turned?" Maybe the answer is you, gulp - hook, line and sinker! "All hail Al Gore" for he is the new prophet. hmmm. something to think about?